Burkina Faso vs Mauritania: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Burkina Faso
2,187 kt
in 2023
Mauritania
1,967 kt
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
32nd
Mauritania rank
33rd

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Mauritania
05001.0k1.5k2.0k196119922023

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 2,187 kt against 1,967 kt in Mauritania, a difference of 220 kt.

That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritania ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 32nd and Mauritania ranks 33rd of 179 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 4 and Mauritania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 285.97 kt 642.22 kt 356.25 kt Mauritania
1970s 428.48 kt 718.9 kt 290.42 kt Mauritania
1980s 905.48 kt 758.9 kt 146.57 kt Burkina Faso
1990s 1,090 kt 973.25 kt 116.26 kt Burkina Faso
2000s 1,365 kt 1,484 kt 118.31 kt Mauritania
2010s 1,796 kt 1,713 kt 82.38 kt Burkina Faso
2020s 2,076 kt 1,905 kt 170.85 kt Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Burkina Faso or Mauritania?
Burkina Faso, at 2,187 kt against 1,967 kt in Mauritania as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Burkina Faso and Mauritania?
220 kt, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Mauritania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Mauritania rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Burkina Faso ranks 32nd and Mauritania ranks 33rd of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Mauritania: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/burkina-faso/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/burkina-faso/mauritania/">Burkina Faso vs Mauritania: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
224 places, 12,747 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.