Malta vs Sao Tome and Principe: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Malta
0.5289 kt
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
0.7313 kt
in 2023
Malta rank
170th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
168th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Malta
  • Sao Tome and Principe
01234196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0.7313 kt against 0.5289 kt in Malta, a difference of 0.2024 kt.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.4 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 170th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 168th of 179 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 6 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.8735 kt 0.5849 kt 0.2886 kt Malta
1970s 0.5512 kt 0.3327 kt 0.2185 kt Malta
1980s 0.5452 kt 0.3929 kt 0.1523 kt Malta
1990s 2.13 kt 0.4753 kt 1.66 kt Malta
2000s 1.41 kt 0.6159 kt 0.7906 kt Malta
2010s 1.02 kt 0.6931 kt 0.3268 kt Malta
2020s 0.5036 kt 0.7271 kt 0.2235 kt Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Malta or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 0.7313 kt against 0.5289 kt in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Malta and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.2024 kt, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malta and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Malta ranks 170th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 168th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Sao Tome and Principe: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/malta/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/malta/sao-tome-and-principe/">Malta vs Sao Tome and Principe: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
224 places, 12,747 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.