Belgium-Luxembourg vs New Zealand: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth

Belgium-Luxembourg
-5.85 % change on previous year
in 1999
New Zealand
-4.2 % change on previous year
in 2023
Belgium-Luxembourg rank
150th
New Zealand rank
147th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth over time

  • Belgium-Luxembourg
  • New Zealand
-50050100196219922023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports -4.2 % change on previous year against -5.85 % change on previous year in Belgium-Luxembourg, a difference of 1.65 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 19 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.

Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 150th and New Zealand ranks 147th of 193 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium-Luxembourg averaged higher in 3 and New Zealand in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium-Luxembourg New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s -0.4792 % change on previous year 0.3873 % change on previous year 0.8665 % change on previous year New Zealand
1970s 7.97 % change on previous year 1.44 % change on previous year 6.53 % change on previous year Belgium-Luxembourg
1980s 2.12 % change on previous year -1.88 % change on previous year 4.01 % change on previous year Belgium-Luxembourg
1990s 5.43 % change on previous year -0.3127 % change on previous year 5.74 % change on previous year Belgium-Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, annual growth, Belgium-Luxembourg or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at -4.2 % change on previous year against -5.85 % change on previous year in Belgium-Luxembourg as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, annual growth between Belgium-Luxembourg and New Zealand?
1.65 % change on previous year, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and New Zealand?
38 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 1999.
How do Belgium-Luxembourg and New Zealand rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, annual growth?
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 150th and New Zealand ranks 147th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium-Luxembourg vs New Zealand: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity-annual-growth-rate/belgium-luxembourg/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity-annual-growth-rate/belgium-luxembourg/new-zealand/">Belgium-Luxembourg vs New Zealand: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
223 places, 12,366 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.