Northern Africa vs Serbia and Montenegro: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth

Northern Africa
-1.34 % change on previous year
in 2023
Serbia and Montenegro
15.22 % change on previous year
in 2005
Northern Africa rank
20th
Serbia and Montenegro rank
18th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth over time

  • Northern Africa
  • Serbia and Montenegro
-2002040196219922023

How they compare

Serbia and Montenegro currently reports 15.22 % change on previous year against -1.34 % change on previous year in Northern Africa, a difference of 16.56 % change on previous year.

That makes Serbia and Montenegro's figure about 11.3 times Northern Africa's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Northern Africa ahead.

Northern Africa ranks 20th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 18th of 30 groups.

Across the 2 decades both report, Northern Africa averaged higher in 1 and Serbia and Montenegro in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Northern Africa Serbia and Montenegro Difference Ahead
1990s -1.3 % change on previous year 0.7596 % change on previous year 2.06 % change on previous year Serbia and Montenegro
2000s 0.1091 % change on previous year -1.55 % change on previous year 1.66 % change on previous year Northern Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, annual growth, Northern Africa or Serbia and Montenegro?
Serbia and Montenegro, at 15.22 % change on previous year against -1.34 % change on previous year in Northern Africa as of 2005.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, annual growth between Northern Africa and Serbia and Montenegro?
16.56 % change on previous year, with Serbia and Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Northern Africa and Serbia and Montenegro?
13 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2005.
How do Northern Africa and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, annual growth?
Northern Africa ranks 20th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 18th of 30 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Northern Africa vs Serbia and Montenegro: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity-annual-growth-rate/northern-africa/serbia-and-montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity-annual-growth-rate/northern-africa/serbia-and-montenegro/">Northern Africa vs Serbia and Montenegro: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
223 places, 12,366 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.