Australia and New Zealand vs Belarus: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity

Australia and New Zealand
26.14 kg CO2eq/kg
in 2023
Belarus
25.2 kg CO2eq/kg
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
113th
Belarus rank
116th

Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Belarus
20406080196119922023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 26.14 kg CO2eq/kg against 25.2 kg CO2eq/kg in Belarus, a difference of 0.94 kg CO2eq/kg.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 113th and Belarus ranks 116th of 178 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Belarus Difference Ahead
1990s 53.36 kg CO2eq/kg 17.5 kg CO2eq/kg 35.87 kg CO2eq/kg Australia and New Zealand
2000s 39.95 kg CO2eq/kg 13.93 kg CO2eq/kg 26.02 kg CO2eq/kg Australia and New Zealand
2010s 31.45 kg CO2eq/kg 19.66 kg CO2eq/kg 11.79 kg CO2eq/kg Australia and New Zealand
2020s 28.24 kg CO2eq/kg 24.65 kg CO2eq/kg 3.59 kg CO2eq/kg Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, Australia and New Zealand or Belarus?
Australia and New Zealand, at 26.14 kg CO2eq/kg against 25.2 kg CO2eq/kg in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity between Australia and New Zealand and Belarus?
0.94 kg CO2eq/kg, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Belarus?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Belarus rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 113th and Belarus ranks 116th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Belarus: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity/australia-and-new-zealand/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-sheep-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity/australia-and-new-zealand/belarus/">Australia and New Zealand vs Belarus: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity
Unit
kg CO2eq/kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
223 places, 12,606 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.