Chile vs Latvia: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Production, per capita
Chile
0.0004 t per person
in 2023
Latvia
0.0004 t per person
in 2023
Chile rank
88th
Latvia rank
87th
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Production, per capita over time
- Chile
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.0004 t per person against 0.0004 t per person in Chile, a difference of 0 t per person.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Chile ranks 88th and Latvia ranks 87th of 160 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0008 t per person | 0.0006 t per person | 0.0002 t per person | Chile |
| 2000s | 0.0006 t per person | 0.0002 t per person | 0.0005 t per person | Chile |
| 2010s | 0.0005 t per person | 0.0004 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | Chile |
| 2020s | 0.0004 t per person | 0.0004 t per person | 0 t per person | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — production, per capita, Chile or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 0.0004 t per person against 0.0004 t per person in Chile as of 2023.
- What is the difference in meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — production, per capita between Chile and Latvia?
- 0 t per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Latvia rank globally for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — production, per capita?
- Chile ranks 88th and Latvia ranks 87th of 160 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.