Latin America and the Caribbean vs Namibia: Millet — Crop residues

Latin America and the Caribbean
0.0013 kt
in 2050
Namibia
0.0073 kt
in 2050
Latin America and the Caribbean rank
26th
Namibia rank
25th

Millet — Crop residues over time

  • Latin America and the Caribbean
  • Namibia
00.0050.010.015196120052050

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.0073 kt against 0.0013 kt in Latin America and the Caribbean, a difference of 0.006 kt.

That makes Namibia's figure about 5.6 times Latin America and the Caribbean's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Latin America and the Caribbean ahead.

Latin America and the Caribbean ranks 26th and Namibia ranks 25th of 30 groups.

Across the 9 decades both report, Latin America and the Caribbean averaged higher in 3 and Namibia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latin America and the Caribbean Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0082 kt 0.001 kt 0.0072 kt Latin America and the Caribbean
1970s 0.0098 kt 0.0016 kt 0.0082 kt Latin America and the Caribbean
1980s 0.0057 kt 0.0023 kt 0.0034 kt Latin America and the Caribbean
1990s 0.0028 kt 0.003 kt 0.0002 kt Namibia
2000s 0.0009 kt 0.0034 kt 0.0025 kt Namibia
2010s 0.0003 kt 0.0025 kt 0.0022 kt Namibia
2020s 0.0003 kt 0.003 kt 0.0027 kt Namibia
2030s 0.0012 kt 0.0055 kt 0.0043 kt Namibia
2050s 0.0013 kt 0.0073 kt 0.006 kt Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher millet — crop residues, Latin America and the Caribbean or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0.0073 kt against 0.0013 kt in Latin America and the Caribbean as of 2050.
What is the difference in millet — crop residues between Latin America and the Caribbean and Namibia?
0.006 kt, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latin America and the Caribbean and Namibia?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Latin America and the Caribbean and Namibia rank globally for millet — crop residues?
Latin America and the Caribbean ranks 26th and Namibia ranks 25th of 30 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Millet — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latin America and the Caribbean vs Namibia: Millet — Crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/millet-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/latin-america-and-the-caribbean/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/millet-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/latin-america-and-the-caribbean/namibia/">Latin America and the Caribbean vs Namibia: Millet — Crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Millet — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
129 places, 6,987 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).