Belarus vs Jamaica: Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita
Belarus
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Jamaica
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Belarus rank
87th
Jamaica rank
87th
Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita over time
- Belarus
- Jamaica
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Jamaica, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 87th and Jamaica ranks 87th of 191 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Belarus |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Belarus |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Belarus |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, per capita, Belarus or Jamaica?
- Belarus, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Jamaica as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area, per capita between Belarus and Jamaica?
- 0 1000 ha per person, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Jamaica?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Belarus and Jamaica rank globally for net forest conversion — area, per capita?
- Belarus ranks 87th and Jamaica ranks 87th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.