Statizoid

Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita in Belarus

Belarus: Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita was 0 1000 ha per person in 2025. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2025)
0 1000 ha per person
World rank
87th
of 191 countries
All-time high
0 1000 ha per person
in 2000
All-time low
0 1000 ha per person
in 2001
Years of data
34
1992–2025

Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita in Belarus, 1992–2025

00001992200820251992: 0 1000 ha per person1993: 0 1000 ha per person1994: 0 1000 ha per person1995: 0 1000 ha per person1996: 0 1000 ha per person1997: 0 1000 ha per person1998: 0 1000 ha per person1999: 0 1000 ha per person2000: 0 1000 ha per person2001: 0 1000 ha per person2002: 0 1000 ha per person2003: 0 1000 ha per person2004: 0 1000 ha per person2005: 0 1000 ha per person2006: 0 1000 ha per person2007: 0 1000 ha per person2008: 0 1000 ha per person2009: 0 1000 ha per person2010: 0 1000 ha per person2011: 0 1000 ha per person2012: 0 1000 ha per person2013: 0 1000 ha per person2014: 0 1000 ha per person2015: 0 1000 ha per person2016: 0 1000 ha per person2017: 0 1000 ha per person2018: 0 1000 ha per person2019: 0 1000 ha per person2020: 0 1000 ha per person2021: 0 1000 ha per person2022: 0 1000 ha per person2023: 0 1000 ha per person2024: 0 1000 ha per person2025: 0 1000 ha per person

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 ha per person.

Analysis

Belarus recorded 0 1000 ha per person for net forest conversion — area, per capita in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 34 years on record.

That represents a change of down 100.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net forest conversion — area, per capita in Belarus peaked at 0 1000 ha per person in 2000 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 ha per person, in 2001.

Belarus ranks 87th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita in Belarus, year by year

Year 1000 ha per person Change
1992 0 1000 ha per person —
1993 0 1000 ha per person -0.2%
1994 0 1000 ha per person +0.1%
1995 0 1000 ha per person +0.3%
1996 0 1000 ha per person +0.3%
1997 0 1000 ha per person +0.4%
1998 0 1000 ha per person +0.5%
1999 0 1000 ha per person +0.5%
2000 0 1000 ha per person +0.5%
2001 0 1000 ha per person -100.0%
2002 0 1000 ha per person —
2003 0 1000 ha per person —
2004 0 1000 ha per person —
2005 0 1000 ha per person —
2006 0 1000 ha per person —
2007 0 1000 ha per person —
2008 0 1000 ha per person —
2009 0 1000 ha per person —
2010 0 1000 ha per person —
2011 0 1000 ha per person —
2012 0 1000 ha per person +0.2%
2013 0 1000 ha per person +0.0%
2014 0 1000 ha per person -0.1%
2015 0 1000 ha per person -0.1%
2016 0 1000 ha per person -100.0%
2017 0 1000 ha per person —
2018 0 1000 ha per person —
2019 0 1000 ha per person —
2020 0 1000 ha per person —
2021 0 1000 ha per person —
2022 0 1000 ha per person —
2023 0 1000 ha per person —
2024 0 1000 ha per person —
2025 0 1000 ha per person —

Biggest year-on-year movements

Years where Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita in Belarus changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.

YearChange FromTo
2001 -100.0% 0 1000 ha per person 0 1000 ha per person
2016 -100.0% 0 1000 ha per person 0 1000 ha per person

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 0 1000 ha per person 0 1000 ha per person 0 1000 ha per person 8
2000s 0 1000 ha per person 0 1000 ha per person 0 1000 ha per person 10
2010s 0 1000 ha per person 0 1000 ha per person 0 1000 ha per person 10
2020s 0 1000 ha per person 0 1000 ha per person 0 1000 ha per person 6

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 84 Italy 0 1000 ha per person compare
  2. 85 Algeria 0 1000 ha per person compare
  3. 86 Jordan 0 1000 ha per person compare
  4. 87 Aruba 0 1000 ha per person
  5. 87 Afghanistan 0 1000 ha per person
  6. 87 Albania 0 1000 ha per person compare
  7. 87 Andorra 0 1000 ha per person compare
  8. 87 United Arab Emirates 0 1000 ha per person
  9. 87 Armenia 0 1000 ha per person compare
  10. 87 American Samoa 0 1000 ha per person compare
  11. 87 Azerbaijan 0 1000 ha per person compare
  12. 87 Burundi 0 1000 ha per person compare
  13. 87 Belgium 0 1000 ha per person compare
  14. 87 Bahrain 0 1000 ha per person
  15. 87 Bahamas 0 1000 ha per person
  16. 87 Bermuda 0 1000 ha per person
  17. 87 Barbados 0 1000 ha per person
  18. 87 Botswana 0 1000 ha per person
  19. 87 Switzerland 0 1000 ha per person compare
  20. 87 China 0 1000 ha per person compare
  21. 87 Comoros 0 1000 ha per person compare
  22. 87 Cuba 0 1000 ha per person compare
  23. 87 Cayman Islands 0 1000 ha per person compare
  24. 87 Czechia 0 1000 ha per person compare
  25. 87 Germany 0 1000 ha per person
  26. 87 Djibouti 0 1000 ha per person
  27. 87 Denmark 0 1000 ha per person compare
  28. 87 Dominican Republic 0 1000 ha per person compare
  29. 87 Egypt 0 1000 ha per person
  30. 87 Spain 0 1000 ha per person compare
  31. 87 Finland 0 1000 ha per person compare
  32. 87 Fiji 0 1000 ha per person
  33. 87 France 0 1000 ha per person
  34. 87 Faroe Islands 0 1000 ha per person
  35. 87 Georgia 0 1000 ha per person
  36. 87 Ghana 0 1000 ha per person
  37. 87 Gibraltar 0 1000 ha per person
  38. 87 Greece 0 1000 ha per person
  39. 87 Grenada 0 1000 ha per person
  40. 87 Greenland 0 1000 ha per person
  41. 87 Guam 0 1000 ha per person
  42. 87 Haiti 0 1000 ha per person compare
  43. 87 Hungary 0 1000 ha per person compare
  44. 87 Indonesia 0 1000 ha per person compare
  45. 87 Isle of Man 0 1000 ha per person
  46. 87 India 0 1000 ha per person
  47. 87 Ireland 0 1000 ha per person compare
  48. 87 Iceland 0 1000 ha per person
  49. 87 Jamaica 0 1000 ha per person compare
  50. 87 Kazakhstan 0 1000 ha per person compare
  51. 87 Kenya 0 1000 ha per person compare
  52. 87 Kyrgyzstan 0 1000 ha per person compare
  53. 87 Kiribati 0 1000 ha per person
  54. 87 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 1000 ha per person
  55. 87 Kuwait 0 1000 ha per person
  56. 87 Lebanon 0 1000 ha per person
  57. 87 Saint Lucia 0 1000 ha per person
  58. 87 Liechtenstein 0 1000 ha per person
  59. 87 Lesotho 0 1000 ha per person
  60. 87 Lithuania 0 1000 ha per person compare
  61. 87 Luxembourg 0 1000 ha per person compare
  62. 87 Latvia 0 1000 ha per person compare
  63. 87 Saint Martin (French part) 0 1000 ha per person
  64. 87 Monaco 0 1000 ha per person
  65. 87 Maldives 0 1000 ha per person
  66. 87 Marshall Islands 0 1000 ha per person compare
  67. 87 Malta 0 1000 ha per person
  68. 87 Montenegro 0 1000 ha per person
  69. 87 Mongolia 0 1000 ha per person compare
  70. 87 Northern Mariana Islands 0 1000 ha per person
  71. 87 Mauritius 0 1000 ha per person compare
  72. 87 New Caledonia 0 1000 ha per person compare
  73. 87 Nepal 0 1000 ha per person compare
  74. 87 Nauru 0 1000 ha per person
  75. 87 New Zealand 0 1000 ha per person compare
  76. 87 Oman 0 1000 ha per person
  77. 87 Pakistan 0 1000 ha per person compare
  78. 87 Philippines 0 1000 ha per person compare
  79. 87 Palau 0 1000 ha per person
  80. 87 Poland 0 1000 ha per person
  81. 87 Portugal 0 1000 ha per person compare
  82. 87 Palestine 0 1000 ha per person
  83. 87 French Polynesia 0 1000 ha per person
  84. 87 Qatar 0 1000 ha per person
  85. 87 Rwanda 0 1000 ha per person compare
  86. 87 Saudi Arabia 0 1000 ha per person
  87. 87 Singapore 0 1000 ha per person compare
  88. 87 El Salvador 0 1000 ha per person compare
  89. 87 San Marino 0 1000 ha per person
  90. 87 Serbia 0 1000 ha per person
  91. 87 South Sudan 0 1000 ha per person compare
  92. 87 Sao Tome and Principe 0 1000 ha per person compare
  93. 87 Slovakia 0 1000 ha per person compare
  94. 87 Sint Maarten (Dutch part) 0 1000 ha per person
  95. 87 Turks and Caicos Islands 0 1000 ha per person
  96. 87 Tajikistan 0 1000 ha per person
  97. 87 Turkmenistan 0 1000 ha per person
  98. 87 Tonga 0 1000 ha per person
  99. 87 Tuvalu 0 1000 ha per person
  100. 87 Ukraine 0 1000 ha per person compare
  101. 87 Uruguay 0 1000 ha per person
  102. 87 Uzbekistan 0 1000 ha per person compare
  103. 87 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 1000 ha per person compare
  104. 87 British Virgin Islands 0 1000 ha per person compare
  105. 87 United States Virgin Islands 0 1000 ha per person compare
  106. 87 Yemen 0 1000 ha per person
  107. 87 South Africa 0 1000 ha per person

See the full ranking of 192 places →

More climate change data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is net forest conversion — area, per capita in Belarus?
Net forest conversion — area, per capita in Belarus was 0 1000 ha per person in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net forest conversion — area, per capita recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 0 1000 ha per person in 2000.
What is the lowest net forest conversion — area, per capita recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 ha per person in 2001.
How does Belarus rank for net forest conversion — area, per capita?
Belarus ranks 87th out of 191 countries with data for 2025.
Is net forest conversion — area, per capita rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 34 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/net-forest-conversion-area-per-capita/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/net-forest-conversion-area-per-capita/belarus/">Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Net Forest conversion — Area ÷ Population, total

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita
Unit
1000 ha per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 6,723 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.