Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita was 0 1000 ha per person in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita in Kazakhstan, 1992–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 ha per person.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net forest conversion — area, per capita in Kazakhstan is 0 1000 ha per person, measured in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 34 years on record.
That represents a change of down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net forest conversion — area, per capita in Kazakhstan peaked at 0 1000 ha per person in 2001 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 ha per person, in 2016.
That places Kazakhstan 87th out of 191 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | 1000 ha per person | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0 1000 ha per person | — |
| 1993 | 0 1000 ha per person | +0.3% |
| 1994 | 0 1000 ha per person | +1.4% |
| 1995 | 0 1000 ha per person | +1.9% |
| 1996 | 0 1000 ha per person | +1.9% |
| 1997 | 0 1000 ha per person | +2.3% |
| 1998 | 0 1000 ha per person | +2.5% |
| 1999 | 0 1000 ha per person | +1.2% |
| 2000 | 0 1000 ha per person | -0.3% |
| 2001 | 0 1000 ha per person | +391.4% |
| 2002 | 0 1000 ha per person | -0.5% |
| 2003 | 0 1000 ha per person | -0.6% |
| 2004 | 0 1000 ha per person | -0.6% |
| 2005 | 0 1000 ha per person | -0.7% |
| 2006 | 0 1000 ha per person | -0.8% |
| 2007 | 0 1000 ha per person | -0.9% |
| 2008 | 0 1000 ha per person | -1.0% |
| 2009 | 0 1000 ha per person | -1.2% |
| 2010 | 0 1000 ha per person | -1.3% |
| 2011 | 0 1000 ha per person | -44.8% |
| 2012 | 0 1000 ha per person | -1.4% |
| 2013 | 0 1000 ha per person | -1.4% |
| 2014 | 0 1000 ha per person | -1.5% |
| 2015 | 0 1000 ha per person | -1.5% |
| 2016 | 0 1000 ha per person | -100.0% |
| 2017 | 0 1000 ha per person | — |
| 2018 | 0 1000 ha per person | — |
| 2019 | 0 1000 ha per person | — |
| 2020 | 0 1000 ha per person | — |
| 2021 | 0 1000 ha per person | — |
| 2022 | 0 1000 ha per person | — |
| 2023 | 0 1000 ha per person | — |
| 2024 | 0 1000 ha per person | — |
| 2025 | 0 1000 ha per person | — |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita in Kazakhstan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | +391.4% | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person |
| 2016 | -100.0% | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person |
| 2011 | -44.8% | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 8 |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 6 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
- 84 Italy 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 85 Algeria 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 86 Jordan 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Aruba 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Afghanistan 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Albania 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Andorra 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 United Arab Emirates 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Armenia 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 American Samoa 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Azerbaijan 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Burundi 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Belgium 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Bahrain 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Bahamas 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Belarus 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Bermuda 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Barbados 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Botswana 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Switzerland 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 China 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Comoros 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Cuba 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Cayman Islands 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Czechia 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Germany 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Djibouti 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Denmark 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Dominican Republic 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Egypt 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Spain 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Finland 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Fiji 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 France 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Faroe Islands 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Georgia 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Ghana 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Gibraltar 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Greece 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Grenada 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Greenland 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Guam 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Haiti 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Hungary 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Indonesia 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Isle of Man 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 India 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Ireland 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Iceland 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Jamaica 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Kenya 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Kyrgyzstan 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Kiribati 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Kuwait 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Lebanon 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Saint Lucia 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Liechtenstein 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Lesotho 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Lithuania 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Luxembourg 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Latvia 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Saint Martin (French part) 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Monaco 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Maldives 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Marshall Islands 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Malta 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Montenegro 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Mongolia 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Northern Mariana Islands 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Mauritius 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 New Caledonia 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Nepal 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Nauru 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 New Zealand 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Oman 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Pakistan 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Philippines 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Palau 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Poland 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Portugal 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Palestine 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 French Polynesia 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Qatar 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Rwanda 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Saudi Arabia 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Singapore 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 El Salvador 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 San Marino 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Serbia 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 South Sudan 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Sao Tome and Principe 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Slovakia 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Sint Maarten (Dutch part) 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Turks and Caicos Islands 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Tajikistan 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Turkmenistan 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Tonga 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Tuvalu 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Ukraine 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Uruguay 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Uzbekistan 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 British Virgin Islands 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 United States Virgin Islands 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Yemen 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 South Africa 0 1000 ha per person
More climate change data for Kazakhstan
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 52.07 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 21,403 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 5,230 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 16,173 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 19.73 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 577.6 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,395 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,596 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 798.63 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 6.02 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net forest conversion — area, per capita in Kazakhstan?
- Net forest conversion — area, per capita in Kazakhstan was 0 1000 ha per person in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net forest conversion — area, per capita recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 0 1000 ha per person in 2001.
- What is the lowest net forest conversion — area, per capita recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 ha per person in 2016.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for net forest conversion — area, per capita?
- Kazakhstan ranks 87th out of 191 countries with data for 2025.
- Is net forest conversion — area, per capita rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 34 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net Forest conversion — Area ÷ Population, total
Computed from
- Net Forest conversion — Area Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Population, total World Population Prospects, United Nations (UN)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.