Kazakhstan vs Nepal: Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita
Kazakhstan
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Nepal
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Kazakhstan rank
87th
Nepal rank
87th
Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita over time
- Kazakhstan
- Nepal
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Nepal, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 87th and Nepal ranks 87th of 191 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 3 and Nepal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, per capita, Kazakhstan or Nepal?
- Kazakhstan, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Nepal as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area, per capita between Kazakhstan and Nepal?
- 0 1000 ha per person, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Nepal?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Kazakhstan and Nepal rank globally for net forest conversion — area, per capita?
- Kazakhstan ranks 87th and Nepal ranks 87th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.