Ireland vs Kazakhstan: Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita
Ireland
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Kazakhstan
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Ireland rank
87th
Kazakhstan rank
87th
Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita over time
- Ireland
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Ireland currently reports 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Ireland ranks 87th and Kazakhstan ranks 87th of 191 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, per capita, Ireland or Kazakhstan?
- Ireland, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Kazakhstan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area, per capita between Ireland and Kazakhstan?
- 0 1000 ha per person, with Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Kazakhstan?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Ireland and Kazakhstan rank globally for net forest conversion — area, per capita?
- Ireland ranks 87th and Kazakhstan ranks 87th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.