Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita in American Samoa
American Samoa: Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita was 0 1000 ha per person in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita in American Samoa, 1990–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 ha per person.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net forest conversion — area, per capita in American Samoa is 0 1000 ha per person, measured in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 36 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net forest conversion — area, per capita in American Samoa peaked at 0 1000 ha per person in 2010 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 ha per person, in 2016.
American Samoa ranks 87th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita in American Samoa, year by year
| Year | 1000 ha per person | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 0 1000 ha per person | — |
| 1991 | 0 1000 ha per person | -2.6% |
| 1992 | 0 1000 ha per person | -2.4% |
| 1993 | 0 1000 ha per person | -2.2% |
| 1994 | 0 1000 ha per person | -2.1% |
| 1995 | 0 1000 ha per person | -2.0% |
| 1996 | 0 1000 ha per person | -1.9% |
| 1997 | 0 1000 ha per person | -1.9% |
| 1998 | 0 1000 ha per person | -1.8% |
| 1999 | 0 1000 ha per person | -1.6% |
| 2000 | 0 1000 ha per person | -1.1% |
| 2001 | 0 1000 ha per person | +351.4% |
| 2002 | 0 1000 ha per person | -0.0% |
| 2003 | 0 1000 ha per person | +0.2% |
| 2004 | 0 1000 ha per person | +0.3% |
| 2005 | 0 1000 ha per person | +0.4% |
| 2006 | 0 1000 ha per person | +0.4% |
| 2007 | 0 1000 ha per person | +0.5% |
| 2008 | 0 1000 ha per person | +0.5% |
| 2009 | 0 1000 ha per person | +0.5% |
| 2010 | 0 1000 ha per person | +0.5% |
| 2011 | 0 1000 ha per person | -55.6% |
| 2012 | 0 1000 ha per person | +0.7% |
| 2013 | 0 1000 ha per person | +0.9% |
| 2014 | 0 1000 ha per person | +1.0% |
| 2015 | 0 1000 ha per person | +1.1% |
| 2016 | 0 1000 ha per person | -100.0% |
| 2017 | 0 1000 ha per person | — |
| 2018 | 0 1000 ha per person | — |
| 2019 | 0 1000 ha per person | — |
| 2020 | 0 1000 ha per person | — |
| 2021 | 0 1000 ha per person | — |
| 2022 | 0 1000 ha per person | — |
| 2023 | 0 1000 ha per person | — |
| 2024 | 0 1000 ha per person | — |
| 2025 | 0 1000 ha per person | — |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita in American Samoa changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | +351.4% | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person |
| 2016 | -100.0% | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person |
| 2011 | -55.6% | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 6 |
Countries ranked near American Samoa
- 84 Italy 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 85 Algeria 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 86 Jordan 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Aruba 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Afghanistan 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Albania 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Andorra 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 United Arab Emirates 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Armenia 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Azerbaijan 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Burundi 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Belgium 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Bahrain 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Bahamas 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Belarus 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Bermuda 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Barbados 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Botswana 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Switzerland 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 China 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Comoros 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Cuba 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Cayman Islands 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Czechia 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Germany 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Djibouti 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Denmark 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Dominican Republic 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Egypt 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Spain 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Finland 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Fiji 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 France 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Faroe Islands 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Georgia 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Ghana 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Gibraltar 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Greece 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Grenada 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Greenland 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Guam 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Haiti 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Hungary 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Indonesia 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Isle of Man 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 India 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Ireland 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Iceland 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Jamaica 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Kazakhstan 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Kenya 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Kyrgyzstan 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Kiribati 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Kuwait 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Lebanon 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Saint Lucia 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Liechtenstein 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Lesotho 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Lithuania 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Luxembourg 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Latvia 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Saint Martin (French part) 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Monaco 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Maldives 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Marshall Islands 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Malta 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Montenegro 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Mongolia 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Northern Mariana Islands 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Mauritius 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 New Caledonia 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Nepal 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Nauru 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 New Zealand 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Oman 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Pakistan 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Philippines 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Palau 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Poland 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Portugal 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Palestine 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 French Polynesia 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Qatar 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Rwanda 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Saudi Arabia 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Singapore 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 El Salvador 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 San Marino 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Serbia 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 South Sudan 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Sao Tome and Principe 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Slovakia 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Sint Maarten (Dutch part) 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Turks and Caicos Islands 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Tajikistan 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Turkmenistan 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Tonga 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Tuvalu 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Ukraine 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Uruguay 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 Uzbekistan 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 British Virgin Islands 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 United States Virgin Islands 0 1000 ha per person compare
- 87 Yemen 0 1000 ha per person
- 87 South Africa 0 1000 ha per person
More climate change data for American Samoa
- Summer temperature anomalies -0.1017 °C (2026)
- Spring temperature anomalies 0.1942 °C (2026)
- Share of global CO₂ emissions and population 0.0% (2100)
- Temperature anomalies by month 0.0944 °C (2026)
- Winter temperature anomalies 0.2171 °C (2025)
- Precipitation anomalies 406.76 millimeters (2025)
- Annual precipitation 2,994 millimeters (2025)
- Population, total 46,029 (2025)
- Urban population growth -2.1% (2025)
- Urban population 37,059 (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net forest conversion — area, per capita in American Samoa?
- Net forest conversion — area, per capita in American Samoa was 0 1000 ha per person in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net forest conversion — area, per capita recorded in American Samoa?
- The highest recorded value was 0 1000 ha per person in 2010.
- What is the lowest net forest conversion — area, per capita recorded in American Samoa?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 ha per person in 2016.
- How does American Samoa rank for net forest conversion — area, per capita?
- American Samoa ranks 87th out of 191 countries with data for 2025.
- Is net forest conversion — area, per capita rising or falling in American Samoa?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this American Samoa data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 36 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net Forest conversion — Area ÷ Population, total
Computed from
- Net Forest conversion — Area Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Population, total World Population Prospects, United Nations (UN)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.