Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita in South Sudan

South Sudan: Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita was 0 1000 ha per person in 2025. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2025)
0 1000 ha per person
World rank
87th
of 191 countries
All-time high
0 1000 ha per person
in 2018
All-time low
0 1000 ha per person
in 2012
Years of data
14
2012–2025

Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita in South Sudan, 2012–2025

0000002012201820252012: 0 1000 ha per person2013: 0 1000 ha per person2014: 0 1000 ha per person2015: 0 1000 ha per person2016: 0 1000 ha per person2017: 0 1000 ha per person2018: 0 1000 ha per person2019: 0 1000 ha per person2020: 0 1000 ha per person2021: 0 1000 ha per person2022: 0 1000 ha per person2023: 0 1000 ha per person2024: 0 1000 ha per person2025: 0 1000 ha per person

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 ha per person.

Analysis

The most recent figure for net forest conversion — area, per capita in South Sudan is 0 1000 ha per person, measured in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 14 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 100.0% over five years.

Over the whole period, net forest conversion — area, per capita in South Sudan peaked at 0 1000 ha per person in 2018 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 ha per person, in 2012.

That places South Sudan 87th out of 191 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita in South Sudan, year by year

Annual values for Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita in South Sudan, 2012 to 2025.
Year 1000 ha per person Change
2012 0 1000 ha per person —
2013 0 1000 ha per person —
2014 0 1000 ha per person —
2015 0 1000 ha per person —
2016 0 1000 ha per person —
2017 0 1000 ha per person +5.6%
2018 0 1000 ha per person +1.3%
2019 0 1000 ha per person -2.9%
2020 0 1000 ha per person -2.6%
2021 0 1000 ha per person -100.0%
2022 0 1000 ha per person —
2023 0 1000 ha per person —
2024 0 1000 ha per person —
2025 0 1000 ha per person —

South Sudan compared with similar countries

  • South Sudan's 0 1000 ha per person is below the median for low income countries, which is 0 1000 ha per person. (22 countries reporting)
  • South Sudan's 0 1000 ha per person is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0 1000 ha per person. (44 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 0 1000 ha per person 0 1000 ha per person 0 1000 ha per person 8
2020s 0 1000 ha per person 0 1000 ha per person 0 1000 ha per person 6

Countries ranked near South Sudan

  1. 84 Italy 0 1000 ha per person compare
  2. 85 Algeria 0 1000 ha per person compare
  3. 86 Jordan 0 1000 ha per person compare
  4. 87 Aruba 0 1000 ha per person
  5. 87 Afghanistan 0 1000 ha per person
  6. 87 Albania 0 1000 ha per person compare
  7. 87 Andorra 0 1000 ha per person compare
  8. 87 United Arab Emirates 0 1000 ha per person
  9. 87 Armenia 0 1000 ha per person compare
  10. 87 American Samoa 0 1000 ha per person compare
  11. 87 Azerbaijan 0 1000 ha per person compare
  12. 87 Burundi 0 1000 ha per person compare
  13. 87 Belgium 0 1000 ha per person compare
  14. 87 Bahrain 0 1000 ha per person
  15. 87 Bahamas 0 1000 ha per person
  16. 87 Belarus 0 1000 ha per person compare
  17. 87 Bermuda 0 1000 ha per person
  18. 87 Barbados 0 1000 ha per person
  19. 87 Botswana 0 1000 ha per person
  20. 87 Switzerland 0 1000 ha per person compare
  21. 87 China 0 1000 ha per person compare
  22. 87 Comoros 0 1000 ha per person compare
  23. 87 Cuba 0 1000 ha per person compare
  24. 87 Cayman Islands 0 1000 ha per person compare
  25. 87 Czechia 0 1000 ha per person compare
  26. 87 Germany 0 1000 ha per person
  27. 87 Djibouti 0 1000 ha per person
  28. 87 Denmark 0 1000 ha per person compare
  29. 87 Dominican Republic 0 1000 ha per person compare
  30. 87 Egypt 0 1000 ha per person
  31. 87 Spain 0 1000 ha per person compare
  32. 87 Finland 0 1000 ha per person compare
  33. 87 Fiji 0 1000 ha per person
  34. 87 France 0 1000 ha per person
  35. 87 Faroe Islands 0 1000 ha per person
  36. 87 Georgia 0 1000 ha per person
  37. 87 Ghana 0 1000 ha per person
  38. 87 Gibraltar 0 1000 ha per person
  39. 87 Greece 0 1000 ha per person
  40. 87 Grenada 0 1000 ha per person
  41. 87 Greenland 0 1000 ha per person
  42. 87 Guam 0 1000 ha per person
  43. 87 Haiti 0 1000 ha per person compare
  44. 87 Hungary 0 1000 ha per person compare
  45. 87 Indonesia 0 1000 ha per person compare
  46. 87 Isle of Man 0 1000 ha per person
  47. 87 India 0 1000 ha per person
  48. 87 Ireland 0 1000 ha per person compare
  49. 87 Iceland 0 1000 ha per person
  50. 87 Jamaica 0 1000 ha per person compare
  51. 87 Kazakhstan 0 1000 ha per person compare
  52. 87 Kenya 0 1000 ha per person compare
  53. 87 Kyrgyzstan 0 1000 ha per person compare
  54. 87 Kiribati 0 1000 ha per person
  55. 87 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 1000 ha per person
  56. 87 Kuwait 0 1000 ha per person
  57. 87 Lebanon 0 1000 ha per person
  58. 87 Saint Lucia 0 1000 ha per person
  59. 87 Liechtenstein 0 1000 ha per person
  60. 87 Lesotho 0 1000 ha per person
  61. 87 Lithuania 0 1000 ha per person compare
  62. 87 Luxembourg 0 1000 ha per person compare
  63. 87 Latvia 0 1000 ha per person compare
  64. 87 Saint Martin (French part) 0 1000 ha per person
  65. 87 Monaco 0 1000 ha per person
  66. 87 Maldives 0 1000 ha per person
  67. 87 Marshall Islands 0 1000 ha per person compare
  68. 87 Malta 0 1000 ha per person
  69. 87 Montenegro 0 1000 ha per person
  70. 87 Mongolia 0 1000 ha per person compare
  71. 87 Northern Mariana Islands 0 1000 ha per person
  72. 87 Mauritius 0 1000 ha per person compare
  73. 87 New Caledonia 0 1000 ha per person compare
  74. 87 Nepal 0 1000 ha per person compare
  75. 87 Nauru 0 1000 ha per person
  76. 87 New Zealand 0 1000 ha per person compare
  77. 87 Oman 0 1000 ha per person
  78. 87 Pakistan 0 1000 ha per person compare
  79. 87 Philippines 0 1000 ha per person compare
  80. 87 Palau 0 1000 ha per person
  81. 87 Poland 0 1000 ha per person
  82. 87 Portugal 0 1000 ha per person compare
  83. 87 Palestine 0 1000 ha per person
  84. 87 French Polynesia 0 1000 ha per person
  85. 87 Qatar 0 1000 ha per person
  86. 87 Rwanda 0 1000 ha per person compare
  87. 87 Saudi Arabia 0 1000 ha per person
  88. 87 Singapore 0 1000 ha per person compare
  89. 87 El Salvador 0 1000 ha per person compare
  90. 87 San Marino 0 1000 ha per person
  91. 87 Serbia 0 1000 ha per person
  92. 87 Sao Tome and Principe 0 1000 ha per person compare
  93. 87 Slovakia 0 1000 ha per person compare
  94. 87 Sint Maarten (Dutch part) 0 1000 ha per person
  95. 87 Turks and Caicos Islands 0 1000 ha per person
  96. 87 Tajikistan 0 1000 ha per person
  97. 87 Turkmenistan 0 1000 ha per person
  98. 87 Tonga 0 1000 ha per person
  99. 87 Tuvalu 0 1000 ha per person
  100. 87 Ukraine 0 1000 ha per person compare
  101. 87 Uruguay 0 1000 ha per person
  102. 87 Uzbekistan 0 1000 ha per person compare
  103. 87 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 1000 ha per person compare
  104. 87 British Virgin Islands 0 1000 ha per person compare
  105. 87 United States Virgin Islands 0 1000 ha per person compare
  106. 87 Yemen 0 1000 ha per person
  107. 87 South Africa 0 1000 ha per person

See the full ranking of 192 places →

More climate change data for South Sudan

All data for South Sudan →

Frequently asked questions

What is net forest conversion — area, per capita in South Sudan?
Net forest conversion — area, per capita in South Sudan was 0 1000 ha per person in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net forest conversion — area, per capita recorded in South Sudan?
The highest recorded value was 0 1000 ha per person in 2018.
What is the lowest net forest conversion — area, per capita recorded in South Sudan?
The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 ha per person in 2012.
How does South Sudan rank for net forest conversion — area, per capita?
South Sudan ranks 87th out of 191 countries with data for 2025.
Where does this South Sudan data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita in South Sudan. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/net-forest-conversion-area-per-capita/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/net-forest-conversion-area-per-capita/south-sudan/">Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita in South Sudan</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Net Forest conversion — Area ÷ Population, total

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita
Unit
1000 ha per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 6,723 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.