Luxembourg vs South Sudan: Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita
Luxembourg
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
South Sudan
0 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Luxembourg rank
87th
South Sudan rank
87th
Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita over time
- Luxembourg
- South Sudan
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in South Sudan, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.
Across all 14 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Luxembourg ranks 87th and South Sudan ranks 87th of 191 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — area, per capita, Luxembourg or South Sudan?
- Luxembourg, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in South Sudan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — area, per capita between Luxembourg and South Sudan?
- 0 1000 ha per person, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and South Sudan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Luxembourg and South Sudan rank globally for net forest conversion — area, per capita?
- Luxembourg ranks 87th and South Sudan ranks 87th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.