Belarus vs Finland: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Belarus
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
94th
Finland rank
94th

Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • Finland
00.020.040.060.08199020062023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Finland, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 94th and Finland ranks 94th of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Finland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Finland Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0146 kt per square kilometre 0.0063 kt per square kilometre 0.0083 kt per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 0.0015 kt per square kilometre 0.0693 kt per square kilometre 0.0678 kt per square kilometre Finland
2010s 0.0087 kt per square kilometre 0.0324 kt per square kilometre 0.0238 kt per square kilometre Finland
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0078 kt per square kilometre 0.0078 kt per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Belarus or Finland?
Belarus, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Finland as of 2023.
What is the difference in net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Belarus and Finland?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Finland?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Finland rank globally for net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 94th and Finland ranks 94th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Finland: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/net-forest-conversion-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/finland/">Belarus vs Finland: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.