Statizoid

Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre in Belarus

Belarus: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre was 0 kt per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
0 kt per square kilometre
World rank
94th
of 200 countries
All-time high
0.0173 kt per square kilometre
in 2012
All-time low
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2001
Years of data
32
1992–2023

Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre in Belarus, 1992–2023

00.0050.010.0151992200720231992: 0.015 kt per square kilometre1993: 0.015 kt per square kilometre1994: 0.015 kt per square kilometre1995: 0.015 kt per square kilometre1996: 0.015 kt per square kilometre1997: 0.015 kt per square kilometre1998: 0.015 kt per square kilometre1999: 0.015 kt per square kilometre2000: 0.015 kt per square kilometre2001: 0 kt per square kilometre2002: 0 kt per square kilometre2003: 0 kt per square kilometre2004: 0 kt per square kilometre2005: 0 kt per square kilometre2006: 0 kt per square kilometre2007: 0 kt per square kilometre2008: 0 kt per square kilometre2009: 0 kt per square kilometre2010: 0 kt per square kilometre2011: 0.017 kt per square kilometre2012: 0.017 kt per square kilometre2013: 0.017 kt per square kilometre2014: 0.017 kt per square kilometre2015: 0.017 kt per square kilometre2016: 0 kt per square kilometre2017: 0 kt per square kilometre2018: 0 kt per square kilometre2019: 0 kt per square kilometre2020: 0 kt per square kilometre2021: 0 kt per square kilometre2022: 0 kt per square kilometre2023: 0 kt per square kilometre

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in kt per square kilometre.

Analysis

In 2023, net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre in Belarus stood at 0 kt per square kilometre. That is the lowest value across all 32 years on record.

That represents a change of down 100.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre in Belarus peaked at 0.0173 kt per square kilometre in 2012 and was at its lowest, 0 kt per square kilometre, in 2001.

That places Belarus 94th out of 200 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre in Belarus, year by year

Year kt per square kilometre Change
1992 0.0146 kt per square kilometre —
1993 0.0146 kt per square kilometre +0.0%
1994 0.0146 kt per square kilometre +0.0%
1995 0.0146 kt per square kilometre +0.0%
1996 0.0146 kt per square kilometre +0.0%
1997 0.0146 kt per square kilometre -0.0%
1998 0.0146 kt per square kilometre +0.0%
1999 0.0146 kt per square kilometre -0.0%
2000 0.0146 kt per square kilometre -0.0%
2001 0 kt per square kilometre -100.0%
2002 0 kt per square kilometre —
2003 0 kt per square kilometre —
2004 0 kt per square kilometre —
2005 0 kt per square kilometre —
2006 0 kt per square kilometre —
2007 0 kt per square kilometre —
2008 0 kt per square kilometre —
2009 0 kt per square kilometre —
2010 0 kt per square kilometre —
2011 0.0173 kt per square kilometre —
2012 0.0173 kt per square kilometre +0.0%
2013 0.0173 kt per square kilometre -0.0%
2014 0.0173 kt per square kilometre -0.0%
2015 0.0173 kt per square kilometre -0.0%
2016 0 kt per square kilometre -100.0%
2017 0 kt per square kilometre —
2018 0 kt per square kilometre —
2019 0 kt per square kilometre —
2020 0 kt per square kilometre —
2021 0 kt per square kilometre —
2022 0 kt per square kilometre —
2023 0 kt per square kilometre —

Biggest year-on-year movements

Years where Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre in Belarus changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.

YearChange FromTo
2001 -100.0% 0.0146 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre
2016 -100.0% 0.0173 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 0.0146 kt per square kilometre 0.0146 kt per square kilometre 0.0146 kt per square kilometre 8
2000s 0.0015 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0146 kt per square kilometre 10
2010s 0.0087 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0173 kt per square kilometre 10
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 4

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 91 Algeria 0.0001 kt per square kilometre compare
  2. 92 Libya 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  3. 93 Jordan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  4. 94 Aruba 0 kt per square kilometre
  5. 94 Afghanistan 0 kt per square kilometre
  6. 94 Albania 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  7. 94 Andorra 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  8. 94 United Arab Emirates 0 kt per square kilometre
  9. 94 Armenia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  10. 94 American Samoa 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  11. 94 Azerbaijan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  12. 94 Burundi 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  13. 94 Belgium 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  14. 94 Bahrain 0 kt per square kilometre
  15. 94 Bahamas 0 kt per square kilometre
  16. 94 Bermuda 0 kt per square kilometre
  17. 94 Barbados 0 kt per square kilometre
  18. 94 Botswana 0 kt per square kilometre
  19. 94 Switzerland 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  20. 94 China 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  21. 94 Comoros 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  22. 94 Cuba 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  23. 94 Cayman Islands 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  24. 94 Czechia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  25. 94 Germany 0 kt per square kilometre
  26. 94 Djibouti 0 kt per square kilometre
  27. 94 Denmark 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  28. 94 Dominican Republic 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  29. 94 Egypt 0 kt per square kilometre
  30. 94 Spain 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  31. 94 Finland 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  32. 94 Fiji 0 kt per square kilometre
  33. 94 France 0 kt per square kilometre
  34. 94 Faroe Islands 0 kt per square kilometre
  35. 94 United Kingdom 0 kt per square kilometre
  36. 94 Georgia 0 kt per square kilometre
  37. 94 Ghana 0 kt per square kilometre
  38. 94 Gibraltar 0 kt per square kilometre
  39. 94 Greece 0 kt per square kilometre
  40. 94 Grenada 0 kt per square kilometre
  41. 94 Greenland 0 kt per square kilometre
  42. 94 Guam 0 kt per square kilometre
  43. 94 Haiti 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  44. 94 Hungary 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  45. 94 Indonesia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  46. 94 Isle of Man 0 kt per square kilometre
  47. 94 India 0 kt per square kilometre
  48. 94 Ireland 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  49. 94 Iceland 0 kt per square kilometre
  50. 94 Jamaica 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  51. 94 Kazakhstan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  52. 94 Kenya 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  53. 94 Kyrgyzstan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  54. 94 Kiribati 0 kt per square kilometre
  55. 94 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 kt per square kilometre
  56. 94 Kuwait 0 kt per square kilometre
  57. 94 Lebanon 0 kt per square kilometre
  58. 94 Saint Lucia 0 kt per square kilometre
  59. 94 Liechtenstein 0 kt per square kilometre
  60. 94 Lesotho 0 kt per square kilometre
  61. 94 Lithuania 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  62. 94 Luxembourg 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  63. 94 Latvia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  64. 94 Monaco 0 kt per square kilometre
  65. 94 Maldives 0 kt per square kilometre
  66. 94 Marshall Islands 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  67. 94 Malta 0 kt per square kilometre
  68. 94 Montenegro 0 kt per square kilometre
  69. 94 Mongolia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  70. 94 Northern Mariana Islands 0 kt per square kilometre
  71. 94 Mauritius 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  72. 94 New Caledonia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  73. 94 Nepal 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  74. 94 Nauru 0 kt per square kilometre
  75. 94 New Zealand 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  76. 94 Oman 0 kt per square kilometre
  77. 94 Pakistan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  78. 94 Philippines 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  79. 94 Palau 0 kt per square kilometre
  80. 94 Poland 0 kt per square kilometre
  81. 94 Portugal 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  82. 94 Palestine 0 kt per square kilometre
  83. 94 French Polynesia 0 kt per square kilometre
  84. 94 Qatar 0 kt per square kilometre
  85. 94 Russia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  86. 94 Rwanda 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  87. 94 Saudi Arabia 0 kt per square kilometre
  88. 94 Singapore 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  89. 94 El Salvador 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  90. 94 San Marino 0 kt per square kilometre
  91. 94 Serbia 0 kt per square kilometre
  92. 94 South Sudan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  93. 94 Sao Tome and Principe 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  94. 94 Slovakia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  95. 94 Syria 0 kt per square kilometre
  96. 94 Turks and Caicos Islands 0 kt per square kilometre
  97. 94 Tajikistan 0 kt per square kilometre
  98. 94 Turkmenistan 0 kt per square kilometre
  99. 94 Tonga 0 kt per square kilometre
  100. 94 Turkey 0 kt per square kilometre
  101. 94 Tuvalu 0 kt per square kilometre
  102. 94 Ukraine 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  103. 94 Uruguay 0 kt per square kilometre
  104. 94 Uzbekistan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  105. 94 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  106. 94 British Virgin Islands 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  107. 94 United States Virgin Islands 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  108. 94 Yemen 0 kt per square kilometre
  109. 94 South Africa 0 kt per square kilometre

See the full ranking of 201 places →

More climate change data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre in Belarus?
Net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre in Belarus was 0 kt per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 0.0173 kt per square kilometre in 2012.
What is the lowest net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 0 kt per square kilometre in 2001.
How does Belarus rank for net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 94th out of 200 countries with data for 2023.
Is net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 32 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/net-forest-conversion-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/net-forest-conversion-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/">Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.