Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre in Cuba
Cuba: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre was 0 kt per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre in Cuba, 1990–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in kt per square kilometre.
Analysis
Cuba recorded 0 kt per square kilometre for net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre in 2023. That is the lowest value across all 34 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 100.0% over five years.
Over the whole period, net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre in Cuba peaked at 0.0111 kt per square kilometre in 2017 and was at its lowest, 0 kt per square kilometre, in 2001.
That places Cuba 94th out of 200 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre in Cuba, year by year
| Year | kt per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 0.0029 kt per square kilometre | — |
| 1991 | 0.0029 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.0029 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.0029 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.0029 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.0029 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.0029 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.0029 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.0029 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.0029 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.0029 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 2002 | 0 kt per square kilometre | — |
| 2003 | 0 kt per square kilometre | — |
| 2004 | 0 kt per square kilometre | — |
| 2005 | 0 kt per square kilometre | — |
| 2006 | 0 kt per square kilometre | — |
| 2007 | 0 kt per square kilometre | — |
| 2008 | 0 kt per square kilometre | — |
| 2009 | 0 kt per square kilometre | — |
| 2010 | 0 kt per square kilometre | — |
| 2011 | 0 kt per square kilometre | — |
| 2012 | 0 kt per square kilometre | — |
| 2013 | 0 kt per square kilometre | — |
| 2014 | 0 kt per square kilometre | — |
| 2015 | 0 kt per square kilometre | — |
| 2016 | 0.0111 kt per square kilometre | — |
| 2017 | 0.0111 kt per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2018 | 0.0111 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.0111 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 0.0111 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 2022 | 0 kt per square kilometre | — |
| 2023 | 0 kt per square kilometre | — |
Cuba compared with similar countries
- Cuba's 0 kt per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.0076 kt per square kilometre. (37 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0029 kt per square kilometre | 0.0029 kt per square kilometre | 0.0029 kt per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0003 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0.0029 kt per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0044 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0.0111 kt per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0028 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0.0111 kt per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
- 91 Algeria 0.0001 kt per square kilometre compare
- 92 Libya 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 93 Jordan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Aruba 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Afghanistan 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Albania 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Andorra 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 United Arab Emirates 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Armenia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 American Samoa 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Azerbaijan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Burundi 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Belgium 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Bahrain 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Bahamas 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Belarus 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Bermuda 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Barbados 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Botswana 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Switzerland 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 China 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Comoros 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Cayman Islands 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Czechia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Germany 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Djibouti 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Denmark 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Dominican Republic 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Egypt 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Spain 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Finland 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Fiji 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 France 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Faroe Islands 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 United Kingdom 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Georgia 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Ghana 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Gibraltar 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Greece 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Grenada 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Greenland 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Guam 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Haiti 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Hungary 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Indonesia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Isle of Man 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 India 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Ireland 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Iceland 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Jamaica 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Kazakhstan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Kenya 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Kyrgyzstan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Kiribati 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Kuwait 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Lebanon 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Saint Lucia 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Liechtenstein 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Lesotho 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Lithuania 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Luxembourg 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Latvia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Monaco 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Maldives 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Marshall Islands 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Malta 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Montenegro 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Mongolia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Northern Mariana Islands 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Mauritius 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 New Caledonia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Nepal 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Nauru 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 New Zealand 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Oman 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Pakistan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Philippines 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Palau 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Poland 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Portugal 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Palestine 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 French Polynesia 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Qatar 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Russia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Rwanda 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Saudi Arabia 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Singapore 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 El Salvador 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 San Marino 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Serbia 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 South Sudan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Sao Tome and Principe 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Slovakia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Syria 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Turks and Caicos Islands 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Tajikistan 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Turkmenistan 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Tonga 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Turkey 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Tuvalu 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Ukraine 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Uruguay 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Uzbekistan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 British Virgin Islands 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 United States Virgin Islands 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Yemen 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 South Africa 0 kt per square kilometre
More climate change data for Cuba
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 70.05 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 12,131 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 3,149 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 8,982 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 11.88 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 320.8 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,054 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 500.27 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 1,554 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 1.89 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre in Cuba?
- Net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre in Cuba was 0 kt per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0111 kt per square kilometre in 2017.
- What is the lowest net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 kt per square kilometre in 2001.
- How does Cuba rank for net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
- Cuba ranks 94th out of 200 countries with data for 2023.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 34 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.