Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre was 0 kt per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, 1992–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in kt per square kilometre.
Analysis
Kazakhstan recorded 0 kt per square kilometre for net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre in 2023. That is the lowest value across all 32 years on record.
That represents a change of down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre in Kazakhstan peaked at 0.0005 kt per square kilometre in 2001 and was at its lowest, 0 kt per square kilometre, in 2016.
That places Kazakhstan 94th out of 200 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | kt per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0.0001 kt per square kilometre | — |
| 1993 | 0.0001 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.0001 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.0001 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.0001 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.0001 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.0001 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.0001 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.0001 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.0005 kt per square kilometre | +402.1% |
| 2002 | 0.0005 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.0005 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.0005 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.0005 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.0005 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.0005 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.0005 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.0005 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.0005 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.0003 kt per square kilometre | -41.1% |
| 2012 | 0.0003 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.0003 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 0.0003 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 0.0003 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 2017 | 0 kt per square kilometre | — |
| 2018 | 0 kt per square kilometre | — |
| 2019 | 0 kt per square kilometre | — |
| 2020 | 0 kt per square kilometre | — |
| 2021 | 0 kt per square kilometre | — |
| 2022 | 0 kt per square kilometre | — |
| 2023 | 0 kt per square kilometre | — |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 kt per square kilometre | 0.0001 kt per square kilometre | 0.0001 kt per square kilometre | 8 |
| 2000s | 0.0005 kt per square kilometre | 0.0001 kt per square kilometre | 0.0005 kt per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0002 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0.0005 kt per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
- 91 Algeria 0.0001 kt per square kilometre compare
- 92 Libya 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 93 Jordan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Aruba 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Afghanistan 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Albania 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Andorra 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 United Arab Emirates 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Armenia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 American Samoa 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Azerbaijan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Burundi 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Belgium 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Bahrain 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Bahamas 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Belarus 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Bermuda 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Barbados 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Botswana 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Switzerland 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 China 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Comoros 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Cuba 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Cayman Islands 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Czechia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Germany 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Djibouti 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Denmark 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Dominican Republic 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Egypt 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Spain 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Finland 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Fiji 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 France 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Faroe Islands 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 United Kingdom 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Georgia 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Ghana 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Gibraltar 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Greece 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Grenada 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Greenland 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Guam 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Haiti 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Hungary 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Indonesia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Isle of Man 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 India 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Ireland 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Iceland 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Jamaica 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Kenya 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Kyrgyzstan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Kiribati 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Kuwait 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Lebanon 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Saint Lucia 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Liechtenstein 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Lesotho 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Lithuania 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Luxembourg 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Latvia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Monaco 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Maldives 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Marshall Islands 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Malta 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Montenegro 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Mongolia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Northern Mariana Islands 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Mauritius 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 New Caledonia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Nepal 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Nauru 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 New Zealand 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Oman 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Pakistan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Philippines 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Palau 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Poland 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Portugal 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Palestine 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 French Polynesia 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Qatar 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Russia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Rwanda 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Saudi Arabia 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Singapore 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 El Salvador 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 San Marino 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Serbia 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 South Sudan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Sao Tome and Principe 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Slovakia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Syria 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Turks and Caicos Islands 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Tajikistan 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Turkmenistan 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Tonga 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Turkey 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Tuvalu 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Ukraine 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Uruguay 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 Uzbekistan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 British Virgin Islands 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 United States Virgin Islands 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Yemen 0 kt per square kilometre
- 94 South Africa 0 kt per square kilometre
More climate change data for Kazakhstan
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 52.07 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 21,403 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 5,230 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 16,173 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 19.73 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 577.6 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,395 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,596 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 798.63 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 6.02 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre in Kazakhstan?
- Net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre in Kazakhstan was 0 kt per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0005 kt per square kilometre in 2001.
- What is the lowest net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 kt per square kilometre in 2016.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
- Kazakhstan ranks 94th out of 200 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net forest conversion — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 32 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net Forest conversion — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.