Kazakhstan vs Mauritius: Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land)
Kazakhstan
0 kt
in 2025
Mauritius
0 kt
in 2025
Kazakhstan rank
112th
Mauritius rank
112th
Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land) over time
- Kazakhstan
- Mauritius
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Mauritius, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 112th and Mauritius ranks 112th of 243 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 3 and Mauritius in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 294.79 kt | 0 kt | 294.79 kt | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 1,362 kt | 83.17 kt | 1,278 kt | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 583.98 kt | 11.01 kt | 572.97 kt | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0.0868 kt | 0.0868 kt | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2), Kazakhstan or Mauritius?
- Kazakhstan, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Mauritius as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) between Kazakhstan and Mauritius?
- 0 kt, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Mauritius?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Kazakhstan and Mauritius rank globally for net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2)?
- Kazakhstan ranks 112th and Mauritius ranks 112th of 243 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).