Sweden vs Zimbabwe: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that leaches)

Sweden
0.5671 kt
in 2050
Zimbabwe
0.631 kt
in 2050
Sweden rank
66th
Zimbabwe rank
63rd

Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that leaches) over time

  • Sweden
  • Zimbabwe
00.20.40.60.81196120052050

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.631 kt against 0.5671 kt in Sweden, a difference of 0.0639 kt.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.

Sweden ranks 66th and Zimbabwe ranks 63rd of 199 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Sweden averaged higher in 8 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sweden Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.554 kt 0.1117 kt 0.4423 kt Sweden
1970s 0.8763 kt 0.219 kt 0.6573 kt Sweden
1980s 0.8573 kt 0.3007 kt 0.5565 kt Sweden
1990s 0.7236 kt 0.3099 kt 0.4137 kt Sweden
2000s 0.6164 kt 0.2299 kt 0.3865 kt Sweden
2010s 0.626 kt 0.1905 kt 0.4355 kt Sweden
2020s 0.6887 kt 0.3736 kt 0.3151 kt Sweden
2030s 0.5637 kt 0.3708 kt 0.1929 kt Sweden
2050s 0.5671 kt 0.631 kt 0.0639 kt Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — indirect emissions (n2o that leaches), Sweden or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.631 kt against 0.5671 kt in Sweden as of 2050.
What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — indirect emissions (n2o that leaches) between Sweden and Zimbabwe?
0.0639 kt, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Zimbabwe?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Sweden and Zimbabwe rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — indirect emissions (n2o that leaches)?
Sweden ranks 66th and Zimbabwe ranks 63rd of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that leaches) (Synthetic fertilizers). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sweden vs Zimbabwe: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that leaches). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-nitrogen-n-total-indirect-emissions-n2o-that-leaches-synthetic-fertilizers-fao/sweden/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-nitrogen-n-total-indirect-emissions-n2o-that-leaches-synthetic-fertilizers-fao/sweden/zimbabwe/">Sweden vs Zimbabwe: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that leaches)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that leaches) (Synthetic fertilizers)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
252 places, 14,463 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).