Argentina vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that)

Argentina
2.8 kt
in 2050
Democratic Republic of the Congo
0.0181 kt
in 2050
Argentina rank
14th
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
16th

Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that) over time

  • Argentina
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
0123196120052050

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 2.8 kt against 0.0181 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 2.78 kt.

That makes Argentina's figure about 154.7 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Argentina has been ahead every year.

Argentina ranks 14th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 16th of 199 countries.

Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Democratic Republic of the Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0361 kt 0.0018 kt 0.0344 kt Argentina
1970s 0.0686 kt 0.0063 kt 0.0623 kt Argentina
1980s 0.1294 kt 0.005 kt 0.1245 kt Argentina
1990s 0.4681 kt 0.0035 kt 0.4645 kt Argentina
2000s 1.08 kt 0.0027 kt 1.08 kt Argentina
2010s 1.4 kt 0.0199 kt 1.38 kt Argentina
2020s 2.39 kt 0.0399 kt 2.35 kt Argentina
2030s 2.44 kt 0.0078 kt 2.43 kt Argentina
2050s 2.8 kt 0.0181 kt 2.78 kt Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — indirect emissions (n2o that), Argentina or Democratic Republic of the Congo?
Argentina, at 2.8 kt against 0.0181 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2050.
What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — indirect emissions (n2o that) between Argentina and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
2.78 kt, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Argentina and Democratic Republic of the Congo rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — indirect emissions (n2o that)?
Argentina ranks 14th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 16th of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that volatilises) (Synthetic fertilizers). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-nitrogen-n-total-indirect-emissions-n2o-that-volatilises-synthetic-fertilizers/argentina/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-nitrogen-n-total-indirect-emissions-n2o-that-volatilises-synthetic-fertilizers/argentina/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/">Argentina vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that volatilises) (Synthetic fertilizers)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
252 places, 14,463 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).