Canada vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that)

Canada
3.56 kt
in 2050
United Republic of Tanzania
0.3992 kt
in 2050
Canada rank
9th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
9th

Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that) over time

  • Canada
  • United Republic of Tanzania
012345196120052050

How they compare

Canada currently reports 3.56 kt against 0.3992 kt in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 3.16 kt.

That makes Canada's figure about 8.9 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.

Canada ranks 9th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 9th of 199 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3264 kt 0.0048 kt 0.3216 kt Canada
1970s 0.8923 kt 0.0208 kt 0.8715 kt Canada
1980s 1.8 kt 0.0379 kt 1.77 kt Canada
1990s 2.33 kt 0.0383 kt 2.29 kt Canada
2000s 2.67 kt 0.0516 kt 2.62 kt Canada
2010s 3.96 kt 0.1403 kt 3.82 kt Canada
2020s 4.61 kt 0.2412 kt 4.37 kt Canada
2030s 3.2 kt 0.1769 kt 3.02 kt Canada
2050s 3.56 kt 0.3992 kt 3.16 kt Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — indirect emissions (n2o that), Canada or United Republic of Tanzania?
Canada, at 3.56 kt against 0.3992 kt in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2050.
What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — indirect emissions (n2o that) between Canada and United Republic of Tanzania?
3.16 kt, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and United Republic of Tanzania?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Canada and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — indirect emissions (n2o that)?
Canada ranks 9th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 9th of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that volatilises) (Synthetic fertilizers). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-nitrogen-n-total-indirect-emissions-n2o-that-volatilises-synthetic-fertilizers/canada/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-nitrogen-n-total-indirect-emissions-n2o-that-volatilises-synthetic-fertilizers/canada/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Canada vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that volatilises) (Synthetic fertilizers)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
252 places, 14,463 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).