Eswatini vs Mauritius: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that)

Eswatini
0.0163 kt
in 2050
Mauritius
0.0143 kt
in 2050
Eswatini rank
129th
Mauritius rank
132nd

Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Mauritius
00.0050.010.0150.02196120052050

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.0163 kt against 0.0143 kt in Mauritius, a difference of 0.002 kt.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Eswatini ranks 129th and Mauritius ranks 132nd of 199 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0043 kt 0.0151 kt 0.0108 kt Mauritius
1970s 0.0073 kt 0.0158 kt 0.0085 kt Mauritius
1980s 0.0108 kt 0.0168 kt 0.006 kt Mauritius
1990s 0.0057 kt 0.0186 kt 0.0129 kt Mauritius
2000s 0.007 kt 0.015 kt 0.008 kt Mauritius
2010s 0.009 kt 0.0127 kt 0.0037 kt Mauritius
2020s 0.0119 kt 0.0088 kt 0.0031 kt Eswatini
2030s 0.0142 kt 0.0143 kt 0.0001 kt Mauritius
2050s 0.0163 kt 0.0143 kt 0.002 kt Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — indirect emissions (n2o that), Eswatini or Mauritius?
Eswatini, at 0.0163 kt against 0.0143 kt in Mauritius as of 2050.
What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — indirect emissions (n2o that) between Eswatini and Mauritius?
0.002 kt, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Mauritius?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Eswatini and Mauritius rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — indirect emissions (n2o that)?
Eswatini ranks 129th and Mauritius ranks 132nd of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that volatilises) (Synthetic fertilizers). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Mauritius: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-nitrogen-n-total-indirect-emissions-n2o-that-volatilises-synthetic-fertilizers/eswatini/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-nitrogen-n-total-indirect-emissions-n2o-that-volatilises-synthetic-fertilizers/eswatini/mauritius/">Eswatini vs Mauritius: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that volatilises) (Synthetic fertilizers)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
252 places, 14,463 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).