Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Uzbekistan: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that)

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
6 kt
in 2050
Uzbekistan
1.53 kt
in 2050
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
20th
Uzbekistan rank
23rd

Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that) over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Uzbekistan
0246196120052050

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 6 kt against 1.53 kt in Uzbekistan, a difference of 4.47 kt.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 3.9 times Uzbekistan's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 20th and Uzbekistan ranks 23rd of 33 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 2.28 kt 1.21 kt 1.07 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 2.05 kt 0.8708 kt 1.18 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 3.8 kt 1.09 kt 2.71 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 5.01 kt 1.42 kt 3.59 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2030s 3.92 kt 1.2 kt 2.72 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2050s 6 kt 1.53 kt 4.47 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — indirect emissions (n2o that), Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Uzbekistan?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 6 kt against 1.53 kt in Uzbekistan as of 2050.
What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — indirect emissions (n2o that) between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Uzbekistan?
4.47 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Uzbekistan?
34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2050.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Uzbekistan rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — indirect emissions (n2o that)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 20th and Uzbekistan ranks 23rd of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that volatilises) (Synthetic fertilizers). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Uzbekistan: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-nitrogen-n-total-indirect-emissions-n2o-that-volatilises-synthetic-fertilizers/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-nitrogen-n-total-indirect-emissions-n2o-that-volatilises-synthetic-fertilizers/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/uzbekistan/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Uzbekistan: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that volatilises) (Synthetic fertilizers)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
252 places, 14,463 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).