Sweden vs Zimbabwe: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that)

Sweden
0.2521 kt
in 2050
Zimbabwe
0.2804 kt
in 2050
Sweden rank
66th
Zimbabwe rank
63rd

Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that) over time

  • Sweden
  • Zimbabwe
00.10.20.30.4196120052050

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.2804 kt against 0.2521 kt in Sweden, a difference of 0.0283 kt.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.

Sweden ranks 66th and Zimbabwe ranks 63rd of 199 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Sweden averaged higher in 8 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sweden Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2462 kt 0.0496 kt 0.1966 kt Sweden
1970s 0.3894 kt 0.0973 kt 0.2921 kt Sweden
1980s 0.381 kt 0.1337 kt 0.2473 kt Sweden
1990s 0.3216 kt 0.1377 kt 0.1839 kt Sweden
2000s 0.2739 kt 0.1022 kt 0.1717 kt Sweden
2010s 0.2782 kt 0.0847 kt 0.1936 kt Sweden
2020s 0.3061 kt 0.1661 kt 0.14 kt Sweden
2030s 0.2505 kt 0.1648 kt 0.0857 kt Sweden
2050s 0.2521 kt 0.2804 kt 0.0283 kt Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient nitrogen n (total) — indirect emissions (n2o that), Sweden or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.2804 kt against 0.2521 kt in Sweden as of 2050.
What is the difference in nutrient nitrogen n (total) — indirect emissions (n2o that) between Sweden and Zimbabwe?
0.0283 kt, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Zimbabwe?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Sweden and Zimbabwe rank globally for nutrient nitrogen n (total) — indirect emissions (n2o that)?
Sweden ranks 66th and Zimbabwe ranks 63rd of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that volatilises) (Synthetic fertilizers). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sweden vs Zimbabwe: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-nitrogen-n-total-indirect-emissions-n2o-that-volatilises-synthetic-fertilizers/sweden/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-nitrogen-n-total-indirect-emissions-n2o-that-volatilises-synthetic-fertilizers/sweden/zimbabwe/">Sweden vs Zimbabwe: Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Indirect emissions (N2O that volatilises) (Synthetic fertilizers)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
252 places, 14,463 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).