Serbia vs Uruguay: Oats — Crop residues
Oats — Crop residues over time
- Serbia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 0.0161 kt against 0.0155 kt in Uruguay, a difference of 0.0006 kt.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Serbia ranks 38th and Uruguay ranks 39th of 79 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0154 kt | 0.0071 kt | 0.0083 kt | Serbia |
| 2010s | 0.0133 kt | 0.0085 kt | 0.0048 kt | Serbia |
| 2020s | 0.0085 kt | 0.0063 kt | 0.0022 kt | Serbia |
| 2030s | 0.017 kt | 0.011 kt | 0.006 kt | Serbia |
| 2050s | 0.0161 kt | 0.0155 kt | 0.0006 kt | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher oats — crop residues, Serbia or Uruguay?
- Serbia, at 0.0161 kt against 0.0155 kt in Uruguay as of 2050.
- What is the difference in oats — crop residues between Serbia and Uruguay?
- 0.0006 kt, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Uruguay?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2050.
- How do Serbia and Uruguay rank globally for oats — crop residues?
- Serbia ranks 38th and Uruguay ranks 39th of 79 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Oats — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).