Australia vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: On-farm energy use — Emissions (CO2eq)
On-farm energy use — Emissions (CO2eq) over time
- Australia
- Democratic Republic of the Congo
How they compare
Australia currently reports 9,448 kt against 0.63 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 9,447 kt.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 19th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 18th of 169 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher on-farm energy use — emissions (co2eq), Australia or Democratic Republic of the Congo?
- Australia, at 9,448 kt against 0.63 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in on-farm energy use — emissions (co2eq) between Australia and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
- 9,447 kt, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 1999.
- How do Australia and Democratic Republic of the Congo rank globally for on-farm energy use — emissions (co2eq)?
- Australia ranks 19th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 18th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as On-farm energy use — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf