Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Turkmenistan: On-farm energy use — Emissions (CO2eq)

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
12,265 kt
in 2023
Turkmenistan
4,565 kt
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
26th
Turkmenistan rank
36th

On-farm energy use — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Turkmenistan
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k199020062023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 12,265 kt against 4,565 kt in Turkmenistan, a difference of 7,700 kt.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 2.7 times Turkmenistan's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 26th and Turkmenistan ranks 36th of 33 groups.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1990s 14,351 kt 1,181 kt 13,171 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 19,791 kt 2,106 kt 17,685 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 15,543 kt 3,540 kt 12,003 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 13,340 kt 4,374 kt 8,966 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher on-farm energy use — emissions (co2eq), Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Turkmenistan?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 12,265 kt against 4,565 kt in Turkmenistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in on-farm energy use — emissions (co2eq) between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Turkmenistan?
7,700 kt, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Turkmenistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Turkmenistan rank globally for on-farm energy use — emissions (co2eq)?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 26th and Turkmenistan ranks 36th of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as On-farm energy use — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Turkmenistan: On-farm energy use — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/on-farm-energy-use-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/on-farm-energy-use-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/turkmenistan/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Turkmenistan: On-farm energy use — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
On-farm energy use — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
230 places, 7,288 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf