Belgium vs Serbia: Other — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Other — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time
- Belgium
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 177.55 kt against 173.84 kt in Belgium, a difference of 3.71 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 114th and Serbia ranks 112th of 228 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 333.9 kt | 199.81 kt | 134.09 kt | Belgium |
| 2010s | 264.92 kt | 169.49 kt | 95.43 kt | Belgium |
| 2020s | 192.92 kt | 177.15 kt | 15.77 kt | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other — emissions (co2eq), Belgium or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 177.55 kt against 173.84 kt in Belgium as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other — emissions (co2eq) between Belgium and Serbia?
- 3.71 kt, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Serbia rank globally for other — emissions (co2eq)?
- Belgium ranks 114th and Serbia ranks 112th of 228 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf