Botswana vs South Sudan: Other — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Other — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time
- Botswana
- South Sudan
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 373.65 kt against 373.65 kt in South Sudan, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 12 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 74th and South Sudan ranks 74th of 228 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 182.62 kt | 506.15 kt | 323.53 kt | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 247.31 kt | 392.86 kt | 145.55 kt | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other — emissions (co2eq), Botswana or South Sudan?
- Botswana, at 373.65 kt against 373.65 kt in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other — emissions (co2eq) between Botswana and South Sudan?
- 0 kt, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and South Sudan rank globally for other — emissions (co2eq)?
- Botswana ranks 74th and South Sudan ranks 74th of 228 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf