Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: Other — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
10,083 kt
in 2023
South Africa
2,396 kt
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
18th
South Africa rank
16th

Other — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • South Africa
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k196119922023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 10,083 kt against 2,396 kt in South Africa, a difference of 7,687 kt.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 4.2 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was South Africa ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 18th and South Africa ranks 16th of 33 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 5 and South Africa in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 652.99 kt 1,216 kt 562.77 kt South Africa
1970s 966.92 kt 1,368 kt 401.54 kt South Africa
1980s 4,698 kt 1,588 kt 3,110 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1990s 8,014 kt 1,891 kt 6,123 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 8,889 kt 2,472 kt 6,418 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 9,654 kt 2,718 kt 6,936 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 10,174 kt 2,459 kt 7,715 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other — emissions (co2eq), Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or South Africa?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 10,083 kt against 2,396 kt in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in other — emissions (co2eq) between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and South Africa?
7,687 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and South Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and South Africa rank globally for other — emissions (co2eq)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 18th and South Africa ranks 16th of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: Other — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/other-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/other-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/south-africa/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: Other — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,016 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf