Serbia vs Tunisia: Other — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Other — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time
- Serbia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 177.55 kt against 153.44 kt in Tunisia, a difference of 24.11 kt.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times Tunisia's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Serbia ranks 112th and Tunisia ranks 115th of 228 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 199.81 kt | 120.05 kt | 79.77 kt | Serbia |
| 2010s | 169.49 kt | 136.71 kt | 32.78 kt | Serbia |
| 2020s | 177.15 kt | 150.65 kt | 26.5 kt | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other — emissions (co2eq), Serbia or Tunisia?
- Serbia, at 177.55 kt against 153.44 kt in Tunisia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other — emissions (co2eq) between Serbia and Tunisia?
- 24.11 kt, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Tunisia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Serbia and Tunisia rank globally for other — emissions (co2eq)?
- Serbia ranks 112th and Tunisia ranks 115th of 228 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf