Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Other forest — Emissions (N2O)

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
34.52 kt
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
1.48 kt
in 2024
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank
3rd
United Republic of Tanzania rank
5th

Other forest — Emissions (N2O) over time

  • Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
  • United Republic of Tanzania
020406080199020072024

How they compare

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) currently reports 34.52 kt against 1.48 kt in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 33.04 kt.

That makes Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)'s figure about 23.3 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) has been ahead every year.

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 3rd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 5th of 31 groups.

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 40.91 kt 2.93 kt 37.98 kt Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2000s 49.66 kt 4.83 kt 44.83 kt Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2010s 56.54 kt 6.11 kt 50.42 kt Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2020s 40.29 kt 3.26 kt 37.03 kt Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other forest — emissions, Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) or United Republic of Tanzania?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), at 34.52 kt against 1.48 kt in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2024.
What is the difference in other forest — emissions between Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania?
33.04 kt, with Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for other forest — emissions?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 3rd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 5th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Other forest — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/other-forest-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/other-forest-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Other forest — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other forest — Emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
272 places, 9,294 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.