Botswana vs Malawi: Petroleum products — Emissions

Botswana
17.15 kt
in 2023
Malawi
25.49 kt
in 2023
Botswana rank
120th
Malawi rank
117th

Petroleum products — Emissions over time

  • Botswana
  • Malawi
20406080199020062023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 25.49 kt against 17.15 kt in Botswana, a difference of 8.34 kt.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.5 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 120th and Malawi ranks 117th of 155 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 3 and Malawi in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Malawi Difference Ahead
1990s 48.12 kt 25.81 kt 22.31 kt Botswana
2000s 41.46 kt 25.65 kt 15.81 kt Botswana
2010s 27.61 kt 22.46 kt 5.14 kt Botswana
2020s 20.85 kt 22.07 kt 1.21 kt Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher petroleum products — emissions, Botswana or Malawi?
Malawi, at 25.49 kt against 17.15 kt in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in petroleum products — emissions between Botswana and Malawi?
8.34 kt, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Malawi?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Malawi rank globally for petroleum products — emissions?
Botswana ranks 120th and Malawi ranks 117th of 155 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Petroleum products — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Petroleum products — Emissions (CO2)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
190 places, 6,284 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Energy use in agriculture contains data on energy used in agriculture (including forestry, aquaculture and fisheries), for instance to operate machinery, irrigate, heat stables, operate aquaculture ponds and fishing vessels, and related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. It also includes on-farm use of, and related GHG emissions from, electricity and heat generated off-farm. Data are available by country and regional groups with global coverage and are updated annually.