Bangladesh vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Population, total, per square kilometre

Bangladesh
1,319 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics
90.66 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
9th
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
12th

Population, total, per square kilometre over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Central Europe and the Baltics
02505007501.0k1.2k196119922023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 1,319 units per square kilometre against 90.66 units per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 1,228 units per square kilometre.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 14.6 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Bangladesh has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 9th and Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 12th of 216 countries.

Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Central Europe and the Baltics Difference Ahead
1960s 461.5 units per square kilometre 129.44 units per square kilometre 332.06 units per square kilometre Bangladesh
1970s 591.49 units per square kilometre 139 units per square kilometre 452.49 units per square kilometre Bangladesh
1980s 759.61 units per square kilometre 147.82 units per square kilometre 611.79 units per square kilometre Bangladesh
1990s 934.35 units per square kilometre 110.72 units per square kilometre 823.62 units per square kilometre Bangladesh
2000s 1,101 units per square kilometre 96.31 units per square kilometre 1,005 units per square kilometre Bangladesh
2010s 1,219 units per square kilometre 93.33 units per square kilometre 1,125 units per square kilometre Bangladesh
2020s 1,296 units per square kilometre 90.88 units per square kilometre 1,205 units per square kilometre Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population, total, per square kilometre, Bangladesh or Central Europe and the Baltics?
Bangladesh, at 1,319 units per square kilometre against 90.66 units per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in population, total, per square kilometre between Bangladesh and Central Europe and the Baltics?
1,228 units per square kilometre, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Central Europe and the Baltics?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Central Europe and the Baltics rank globally for population, total, per square kilometre?
Bangladesh ranks 9th and Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 12th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Population, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/population-total-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/central-europe-and-the-baltics/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/population-total-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/central-europe-and-the-baltics/">Bangladesh vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Population, total, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population, total, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,342 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population, total divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.