East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Malta: Population, total, per square kilometre

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
133.58 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
1,727 units per square kilometre
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
5th
Malta rank
8th

Population, total, per square kilometre over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Malta
05001.0k1.5k196119922023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 1,727 units per square kilometre against 133.58 units per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 1,593 units per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 12.9 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 5th and Malta ranks 8th of 47 groups.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Malta Difference Ahead
1960s 61.72 units per square kilometre 989.83 units per square kilometre 928.11 units per square kilometre Malta
1970s 77.5 units per square kilometre 953.9 units per square kilometre 876.4 units per square kilometre Malta
1980s 91.83 units per square kilometre 1,045 units per square kilometre 953.09 units per square kilometre Malta
1990s 107.01 units per square kilometre 1,170 units per square kilometre 1,063 units per square kilometre Malta
2000s 118.3 units per square kilometre 1,255 units per square kilometre 1,137 units per square kilometre Malta
2010s 127.99 units per square kilometre 1,395 units per square kilometre 1,267 units per square kilometre Malta
2020s 133.17 units per square kilometre 1,654 units per square kilometre 1,521 units per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population, total, per square kilometre, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Malta?
Malta, at 1,727 units per square kilometre against 133.58 units per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2023.
What is the difference in population, total, per square kilometre between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Malta?
1,593 units per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Malta?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Malta rank globally for population, total, per square kilometre?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 5th and Malta ranks 8th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Malta: Population, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/population-total-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/population-total-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/malta/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Malta: Population, total, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population, total, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,342 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population, total divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.