Botswana vs Iceland: Potatoes — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O)
Potatoes — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O) over time
- Botswana
- Iceland
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 0.0004 kt against 0.0004 kt in Iceland, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Iceland ahead.
Botswana ranks 136th and Iceland ranks 136th of 154 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0004 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0001 kt | Botswana |
| 2020s | 0.0003 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0 kt | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potatoes — crop residues, Botswana or Iceland?
- Botswana, at 0.0004 kt against 0.0004 kt in Iceland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in potatoes — crop residues between Botswana and Iceland?
- 0 kt, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Iceland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Iceland rank globally for potatoes — crop residues?
- Botswana ranks 136th and Iceland ranks 136th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potatoes — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).