Australia and New Zealand vs Belgium: Potatoes — Crop residues

Australia and New Zealand
0.0132 kt
in 2050
Belgium
0.0141 kt
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand rank
43rd
Belgium rank
42nd

Potatoes — Crop residues over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Belgium
0.0050.010.0150.020.025196120052050

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 0.0141 kt against 0.0132 kt in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.0009 kt.

That makes Belgium's figure about 1.1 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 43rd and Belgium ranks 42nd of 154 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Belgium Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0099 kt 0.0152 kt 0.0053 kt Belgium
2010s 0.0091 kt 0.0195 kt 0.0103 kt Belgium
2020s 0.0091 kt 0.0208 kt 0.0116 kt Belgium
2030s 0.0119 kt 0.0152 kt 0.0033 kt Belgium
2050s 0.0132 kt 0.0141 kt 0.0009 kt Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher potatoes — crop residues, Australia and New Zealand or Belgium?
Belgium, at 0.0141 kt against 0.0132 kt in Australia and New Zealand as of 2050.
What is the difference in potatoes — crop residues between Australia and New Zealand and Belgium?
0.0009 kt, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Belgium?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2050.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Belgium rank globally for potatoes — crop residues?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 43rd and Belgium ranks 42nd of 154 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potatoes — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Belgium: Potatoes — Crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/belgium/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/belgium/">Australia and New Zealand vs Belgium: Potatoes — Crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Potatoes — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
204 places, 11,587 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).