Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Poland: Pre- and post-production — Emissions (CO2eq)

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
208,211 kt
in 2023
Poland
61,874 kt
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
18th
Poland rank
15th

Pre- and post-production — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Poland
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k199020062023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 208,211 kt against 61,874 kt in Poland, a difference of 146,337 kt.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 3.4 times Poland's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 18th and Poland ranks 15th of 32 groups.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Poland Difference Ahead
1990s 91,367 kt 43,987 kt 47,381 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 123,823 kt 49,683 kt 74,140 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 161,080 kt 59,869 kt 101,211 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 201,574 kt 62,320 kt 139,253 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pre- and post-production — emissions (co2eq), Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Poland?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 208,211 kt against 61,874 kt in Poland as of 2023.
What is the difference in pre- and post-production — emissions (co2eq) between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Poland?
146,337 kt, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Poland?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Poland rank globally for pre- and post-production — emissions (co2eq)?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 18th and Poland ranks 15th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Pre- and post-production — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Poland: Pre- and post-production — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/pre-and-post-production-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/pre-and-post-production-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/poland/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Poland: Pre- and post-production — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Pre- and post-production — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
275 places, 9,129 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf