Antigua and Barbuda vs Eswatini: Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Antigua and Barbuda
0.0137 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
0.013 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
43rd
Eswatini rank
46th

Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Eswatini
0.010.020.030.04196119922023

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 0.0137 kt per square kilometre against 0.013 kt per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0007 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 43rd and Eswatini ranks 46th of 167 countries.

Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0157 kt per square kilometre 0.013 kt per square kilometre 0.0027 kt per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1970s 0.0203 kt per square kilometre 0.0142 kt per square kilometre 0.0061 kt per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1980s 0.0364 kt per square kilometre 0.0163 kt per square kilometre 0.0201 kt per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1990s 0.0387 kt per square kilometre 0.0148 kt per square kilometre 0.0239 kt per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 0.0372 kt per square kilometre 0.0146 kt per square kilometre 0.0226 kt per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 0.0189 kt per square kilometre 0.0146 kt per square kilometre 0.0043 kt per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 0.0145 kt per square kilometre 0.0134 kt per square kilometre 0.0011 kt per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Antigua and Barbuda or Eswatini?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 0.0137 kt per square kilometre against 0.013 kt per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Antigua and Barbuda and Eswatini?
0.0007 kt per square kilometre, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Eswatini?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Eswatini rank globally for raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 43rd and Eswatini ranks 46th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Eswatini: Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/eswatini/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Eswatini: Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.