Barbados vs Guatemala: Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Barbados
0.0173 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
0.017 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
32nd
Guatemala rank
35th

Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Barbados
  • Guatemala
00.010.020.030.040.05196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0.0173 kt per square kilometre against 0.017 kt per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 0.0003 kt per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 32nd and Guatemala ranks 35th of 167 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0234 kt per square kilometre 0.0056 kt per square kilometre 0.0178 kt per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 0.0255 kt per square kilometre 0.0075 kt per square kilometre 0.0179 kt per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 0.035 kt per square kilometre 0.0088 kt per square kilometre 0.0262 kt per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 0.0324 kt per square kilometre 0.0093 kt per square kilometre 0.0231 kt per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 0.0227 kt per square kilometre 0.0125 kt per square kilometre 0.0102 kt per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 0.0187 kt per square kilometre 0.0158 kt per square kilometre 0.0029 kt per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 0.0173 kt per square kilometre 0.0167 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Barbados or Guatemala?
Barbados, at 0.0173 kt per square kilometre against 0.017 kt per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Barbados and Guatemala?
0.0003 kt per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Guatemala?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Guatemala rank globally for raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Barbados ranks 32nd and Guatemala ranks 35th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Guatemala: Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/barbados/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/barbados/guatemala/">Barbados vs Guatemala: Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.