Brazil vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Brazil
0.0047 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.0048 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
91st
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
90th

Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
00.0050.010.0150.02196119922023

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0.0048 kt per square kilometre against 0.0047 kt per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 0.0001 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Brazil ranks 91st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 90th of 167 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0025 kt per square kilometre 0.0076 kt per square kilometre 0.0051 kt per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 0.0036 kt per square kilometre 0.0081 kt per square kilometre 0.0045 kt per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 0.0052 kt per square kilometre 0.0101 kt per square kilometre 0.0049 kt per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 0.0057 kt per square kilometre 0.0084 kt per square kilometre 0.0028 kt per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 0.0061 kt per square kilometre 0.0137 kt per square kilometre 0.0076 kt per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 0.0062 kt per square kilometre 0.009 kt per square kilometre 0.0028 kt per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 0.0048 kt per square kilometre 0.005 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Brazil or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 0.0048 kt per square kilometre against 0.0047 kt per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Brazil and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.0001 kt per square kilometre, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 91st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 90th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/brazil/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/brazil/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Brazil vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.