Equatorial Guinea vs New Caledonia: Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
0.0001 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
162nd
New Caledonia rank
159th

Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • New Caledonia
000000.001196119922023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0.0001 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0001 kt per square kilometre.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 2.0 times Equatorial Guinea's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 162nd and New Caledonia ranks 159th of 167 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre New Caledonia
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre New Caledonia
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre New Caledonia
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre New Caledonia
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 0.0001 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and New Caledonia?
0.0001 kt per square kilometre, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and New Caledonia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and New Caledonia rank globally for raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 162nd and New Caledonia ranks 159th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs New Caledonia: Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/new-caledonia/">Equatorial Guinea vs New Caledonia: Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.