French Polynesia vs Namibia: Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

French Polynesia
0.0005 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.0007 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
French Polynesia rank
150th
Namibia rank
148th

Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • French Polynesia
  • Namibia
00.0010.0010.0010.0010.002196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.0007 kt per square kilometre against 0.0005 kt per square kilometre in French Polynesia, a difference of 0.0002 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.3 times French Polynesia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Namibia ahead.

French Polynesia ranks 150th and Namibia ranks 148th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, French Polynesia averaged higher in 6 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre French Polynesia
1970s 0.0006 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre French Polynesia
1980s 0.001 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre French Polynesia
1990s 0.0008 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre French Polynesia
2000s 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre French Polynesia
2010s 0.0006 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre French Polynesia
2020s 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, French Polynesia or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0.0007 kt per square kilometre against 0.0005 kt per square kilometre in French Polynesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between French Polynesia and Namibia?
0.0002 kt per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do French Polynesia and Namibia rank globally for raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
French Polynesia ranks 150th and Namibia ranks 148th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Namibia: Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/french-polynesia/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/french-polynesia/namibia/">French Polynesia vs Namibia: Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.