Panama vs Zimbabwe: Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Panama
0.005 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.005 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama rank
89th
Zimbabwe rank
88th

Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Panama
  • Zimbabwe
0.0020.0030.0040.0050.006196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.005 kt per square kilometre against 0.005 kt per square kilometre in Panama, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Panama ranks 89th and Zimbabwe ranks 88th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0024 kt per square kilometre 0.0032 kt per square kilometre 0.0008 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1970s 0.0027 kt per square kilometre 0.0048 kt per square kilometre 0.0021 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0.0033 kt per square kilometre 0.0049 kt per square kilometre 0.0016 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.0042 kt per square kilometre 0.0049 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0052 kt per square kilometre 0.0047 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre Panama
2010s 0.0055 kt per square kilometre 0.0046 kt per square kilometre 0.0008 kt per square kilometre Panama
2020s 0.0049 kt per square kilometre 0.0048 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Panama or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.005 kt per square kilometre against 0.005 kt per square kilometre in Panama as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Panama and Zimbabwe?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Panama and Zimbabwe rank globally for raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Panama ranks 89th and Zimbabwe ranks 88th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Zimbabwe: Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/panama/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/panama/zimbabwe/">Panama vs Zimbabwe: Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.