Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Tunisia: Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.0048 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
0.005 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
90th
Tunisia rank
87th

Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
  • Tunisia
00.0050.010.0150.02196119922023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 0.005 kt per square kilometre against 0.0048 kt per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.0002 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 90th and Tunisia ranks 87th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Saint Kitts and Nevis averaged higher in 6 and Tunisia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saint Kitts and Nevis Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0076 kt per square kilometre 0.002 kt per square kilometre 0.0056 kt per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 0.0081 kt per square kilometre 0.0034 kt per square kilometre 0.0047 kt per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 0.0101 kt per square kilometre 0.003 kt per square kilometre 0.0071 kt per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 0.0084 kt per square kilometre 0.0047 kt per square kilometre 0.0037 kt per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 0.0137 kt per square kilometre 0.0068 kt per square kilometre 0.0069 kt per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 0.009 kt per square kilometre 0.0058 kt per square kilometre 0.0032 kt per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 0.005 kt per square kilometre 0.0051 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 0.005 kt per square kilometre against 0.0048 kt per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Tunisia?
0.0002 kt per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Tunisia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Tunisia rank globally for raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 90th and Tunisia ranks 87th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Tunisia: Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/st-kitts-and-nevis/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/st-kitts-and-nevis/tunisia/">Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Tunisia: Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.