Tunisia vs Zimbabwe: Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Tunisia
0.005 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.005 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia rank
87th
Zimbabwe rank
88th

Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Tunisia
  • Zimbabwe
0.0020.0040.0060.008196119922023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 0.005 kt per square kilometre against 0.005 kt per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Tunisia ranks 87th and Zimbabwe ranks 88th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Tunisia averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tunisia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.002 kt per square kilometre 0.0032 kt per square kilometre 0.0012 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1970s 0.0034 kt per square kilometre 0.0048 kt per square kilometre 0.0013 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0.003 kt per square kilometre 0.0049 kt per square kilometre 0.0019 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.0047 kt per square kilometre 0.0049 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0068 kt per square kilometre 0.0047 kt per square kilometre 0.0021 kt per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 0.0058 kt per square kilometre 0.0046 kt per square kilometre 0.0012 kt per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 0.0051 kt per square kilometre 0.0048 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Tunisia or Zimbabwe?
Tunisia, at 0.005 kt per square kilometre against 0.005 kt per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Tunisia and Zimbabwe?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tunisia and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Tunisia and Zimbabwe rank globally for raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Tunisia ranks 87th and Zimbabwe ranks 88th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tunisia vs Zimbabwe: Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/tunisia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/tunisia/zimbabwe/">Tunisia vs Zimbabwe: Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.