Australia and New Zealand vs Bangladesh: Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)

Australia and New Zealand
23,391 kt
in 2023
Bangladesh
17,961 kt
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
9th
Bangladesh rank
11th

Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Bangladesh
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119922023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 23,391 kt against 17,961 kt in Bangladesh, a difference of 5,430 kt.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.3 times Bangladesh's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 9th and Bangladesh ranks 11th of 190 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Bangladesh Difference Ahead
1960s 20,104 kt 5,118 kt 14,986 kt Australia and New Zealand
1970s 17,636 kt 6,253 kt 11,384 kt Australia and New Zealand
1980s 16,663 kt 7,472 kt 9,192 kt Australia and New Zealand
1990s 19,141 kt 10,470 kt 8,671 kt Australia and New Zealand
2000s 23,310 kt 16,369 kt 6,941 kt Australia and New Zealand
2010s 25,655 kt 17,040 kt 8,615 kt Australia and New Zealand
2020s 23,766 kt 17,792 kt 5,974 kt Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq), Australia and New Zealand or Bangladesh?
Australia and New Zealand, at 23,391 kt against 17,961 kt in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) between Australia and New Zealand and Bangladesh?
5,430 kt, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Bangladesh?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Bangladesh rank globally for raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq)?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 9th and Bangladesh ranks 11th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Bangladesh: Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-emissions-co2eq-ar5/australia-and-new-zealand/bangladesh/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-emissions-co2eq-ar5/australia-and-new-zealand/bangladesh/">Australia and New Zealand vs Bangladesh: Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
239 places, 13,667 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.