China vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq)

China
41,590 kt
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
148,268 kt
in 2023
China rank
4th
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
4th

Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • China
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 148,268 kt against 41,590 kt in China, a difference of 106,678 kt.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 3.6 times China's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

China ranks 4th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 4th of 190 countries.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 1,364 kt 30,954 kt 29,590 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1970s 1,598 kt 36,746 kt 35,149 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1980s 3,959 kt 46,391 kt 42,432 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1990s 9,846 kt 67,034 kt 57,188 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 23,672 kt 103,278 kt 79,607 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 31,143 kt 137,054 kt 105,911 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 37,799 kt 145,006 kt 107,207 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq), China or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 148,268 kt against 41,590 kt in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) between China and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
106,678 kt, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq)?
China ranks 4th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 4th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-emissions-co2eq-ar5/china/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-emissions-co2eq-ar5/china/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">China vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
239 places, 13,667 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.